Now that the rain barrel has made it through its first summer, I can give a preliminary report on how good a job it did of saving us on our water use. We haven't received our water bill yet for August through October, but I went out and checked the water meter, and I found that since the start of August, we've used 840 cubic feet of water, or 6284 gallons. Add that to the total on our last water bill, and we've used 11,370 gallons of water since early May. In 2013, by contrast, we used 12,866 gallons between May 13 and October 30. Now, we probably can't give the rain barrel full credit for this 1,500-gallon drop, since we also installed a new showerhead last spring that probably deserves a bit of the credit, but I think the rain barrel definitely accounts for a good chunk of it. If we use, say, 30 gallons every time we water the garden, and we watered it from the rain barrel twice a week from July through October, then that's over 1,000 gallons right there. Not too shabby.
Unfortunately, the savings in dollar terms are a little less impressive. Our town doesn't bill us by the gallon for the water we use; instead, it puts our household water usage into one of three tiers. If we use less than 800 cubic feet of water in a billing period, we pay the minimum, $48.73. Anything between 800 and 1000 cubic feet puts us in the second tier, for $62.96. If we use over 1,000 cubic feet, no matter how much or how little over, then we pay the maximum bill of $77.70. So our 840 cubic feet of water use, as you can see, puts us just over the limit for the bottom tier. (Of course, this might also have something to do with the fact that it's been 104 days since our last water bill, while last year the billing period was only 86 days. If we'd had the same billing periods this year, we'd have been well below the limit. I sometimes rather cynically suspect that the borough deliberately tweaks the dates each year to try and put as many households over the limit as possible. But realistically, I doubt that they could actually be bothered to do the complicated calculations necessary to maximize their profit. More likely, they just send out the bills whenever they happen to get around to it.)
In any case, using the rain barrel this summer obviously wasn't quite enough to keep our bill down to the minimum. But on the other hand, last year at this time, we were all the way in the top tier, so the barrel has still saved us about 15 bucks in its first summer alone. Maybe next year, with a little more tweaking, we can actually manage to keep it below the minimum all summer long.
2 comments:
Is there any extra charge for being REALLY over the limit for the top end? Someone could fill and empty their swimming pool weekly and pay the same as... a family of four that showers regularly? I'm guessing more precise metering costs more than the borough feels like investing, but this doesn't seem fair.
Have you figured out the ecological benefit? Obviously, you don't need to use treated water in your garden, so you're saving that energy output. But is that enough to counterbalance production and distribution of rain barrels? I hope it would.
Nope, it's just three tiers and that's it. Yeah, it seems a bit weird to me too. I don't think it's a question of metering costs because the meter just measures cubic feet, so I don't see how it would cost more to have additional tier. Maybe it can be put down to the inscrutable tangle of political considerations.
As for the ecological benefits, it's hard to calculate. I'd probably have to do some really in-depth research (like interviewing some water treatment workers) to find out exactly what the environmental impact of local water use is. Our area generally gets plenty of rain, so water shortages aren't a problem. On the other hand, water main breaks seem to happen *all the freaking time*, and I assume it's because our water distribution system is really antiquated and can't handle the load we're now putting on it. So probably anything that reduces it is a good thing on general principles.
Also, not all rain barrels were built for that specific purpose, though ours was. Many are re-purposed industrial-size food barrels from stuff like pickles. So that cuts down significantly on the materials and energy required to make them, and even saves a bit of energy that would otherwise be needed to recycle them.
Post a Comment